MemoirPublished address analysis · Ethereum & Base
A sanctions signal is a finding to verify, not an identified owner
0x7ff9cfad3877f21d41da833e2f775db0569ee3d9The frozen evidence contains sanctions-related provider findings. Treat them as a reason to check the underlying dated source, not as proof of a named controller or a current legal determination.
A historical research snapshot, not a live balance, identity verification or safety rating. Source links may now show newer information.
Finding 1
A provider finding needs its source and date
The September 5, 2026 snapshot includes a TRM sanctions match and GoPlus sanctions flags. This published snapshot is not a live screening result; check the original sources again before relying on current status.
Inspect the frozen evidenceFinding 2
Sources are not candidate owners
A sanctions dataset or screening provider is the source of a finding, not the entity controlling the address. The report’s editorial review corrects that distinction; current ownership remains unconfirmed.
Inspect the frozen evidenceFinding 3
Repeated flags are not necessarily independent evidence
Several providers can repeat the same original list entry. The frozen report contains only four selected timeline records; those records cannot support a complete history or generalize intent to every counterparty.
Inspect the frozen evidenceWhat to check next
Recheck the exact address against current source records and inspect the specific transaction under review. A related transfer does not automatically establish the counterparty’s identity, intent or legal status.
The report covers 4 selected timeline records from May 28, 2022 to Jan 22, 2025. It is not a complete transaction history. Read the report’s source failures and editorial corrections alongside its original AI analysis.
Published by Lanmo Information Consulting. See our evidence methodology and network coverage.